Executive Summary
   
  Chapter 1
Introduction
   
  Chapter 2
Project Description
General
Status of Project
Justification of the Project
Process Details
Steam Power Cycle
Water Condensate
Grid Interface
Raw Material
Product & By product
Water System
Water Requirement
Provision for Pollution Control
Project Implementation
Power Requirement
Waste Water Generation
Spilage, leakage
Boiler Blow Down
Characteristics of waste Water
Effluent Treatment Plant
Effluent Treatment Process
Specification of ETP Plant
Gaseous Emmission
Solid Waste and its Disposal
Noise (Source & Control)
   
  Chapter 3
Environmental Setting of Site
Physical Environment
Aesthetic Environment
Existing Secenario of Co-generation Power Plant
   
  Chapter 4
Environment Impact Prediction
Impact During Construction Phase
Impact during Operation Phase
Impact on Socio-Economic Environment
   
  Chapter 5
Environment Impact Analysis
Matrix Method
Check List Method
Expert Advice
Economic Technique
   
  Chapter 6
Environment Management Plan
Air Pollution Control
Noise Pollution Control
Command Area Development
Monitoring System
Monitoring Facility
   
   
  Annexures
List of Machinery
Study Area
Plot Plan  
Ambient Air Quality Monitored at MPCL  
Meteoroloical Data at MPCL  
Noise Level Monitored Monitored at MPCL  
Ground Water Quality Monitored within Buffer Zone  
Surface Water Quality Monitored Within Buffer Zone  

 Land Use Pattern Within Buffer Zone

 

Soil Quality Monitored Within Buffer Zone

 

Cropping Pattern Within Buffer Zone

 

Demographic Structure Within Buffer Zone

 

Occupational Structure Within Buffer Zone

 

Post Telegraph and Communication Facilities Within Buffer Zone

 

Educational Facilities Within Buffer Zone

 

Health Care Facilities Within Buffer Zone

 

Drinking Water Facilities Within Buffer Zone

 

Flow Diagram of Sugar ETP

 

 

5.3      EXPERT ADVICE

Expert advice should be sought for predictions, which are inherently non-numeric and is particularly suitable for estimating social and cultural impacts. It shall be. preferably taken in the form of a consensus of expert opinion for example, it is necessary to find out whether there is impact on wetland or not. The reduction in the wetland productivity may result in to the fall of sugarcane crop yield. As a consequence the quantity of bagasse required for producing cogeneration shall be severally affected. In case of low crushing during the production of crystal sugar may also had to non-availability of bagasse, which may hamper production of power. In order to mitigate these problems it is very much necessary to continuously monitor the production of sugarcane. It is also necessary to make available the other type of biomass for producing power with the use of boiler.


5.4      ECONOMIC TECHNIQUE

Economic Techniques have been developed tries to value environment and is continuing environmental economics. The most commonly used methods of project appraisal cost of benefit and cost effective analysis. It has been found easy to incorporate environmental impacts into traditional cost benefit analysis principally because of the difficulties in quantifying and valuing environmental effects. An environmental impact assessment can provide information on the expected   effects   and   quantify,   to   some   extent  their   importance.   Cost effectiveness analysis can also be used to determine what is most efficient, least cost method of meeting given environmental objectives, with costs including forgone environmental benefits. The attempts have been made and the two most useful methods for cogeneration power projects are "Effect on Production (EOP) and preventive Expenditure and Replacement Cost" (PE/RC). The EOP method attempts to  represent the value  of change  in output that results of the environmental impact. This method is very easy to carry out and easily understood. For example the assessment of reduce bagasse for power reduction in production due to non-availability of sugarcane due to hydrological changes. The PE /RC method makes assessment of the value that people place on preserving their environment by. estimating what they are prepare to pay to prevent its degradation (preventive expenditure) or to restore its original state after it has been damage (replacement cost).

 
 

                                             Copyright CAIL - 2007                                                                                      Site Designed & Developed by Purple Haze Multimedia